When to lead, when to follow
When to lead, when to follow
Most of the posts to my blog are about
leadership – often they are lessons I’ve learned and practices I use. This post will address an issue I struggled
with: knowing when to lead and knowing when to follow.
I’ll admit that in my early years I wanted to
lead for the sake of leading – executing a coup at recess to take over the
grade five book club is hard to be proud of.
I wasn’t very good at sports or music so never had illusions of grandeur
with those pursuits but when I grew up and found my passions – business and
politics – I was always looking to take charge.
Yet wanting to take charge is very different
from knowing when to lead. Taking charge
and marching off in a new direction will likely teach you the difference
between leadership and arrogance – such as when you look over your shoulder to
notice that no one is following you.
Leadership requires credibility, trust, skill,
experience and particularly a sense of timing.
In my first months as Mayor I was still the
same debater or ‘scrapper’ that I had been as a Councillor – pushing hard to
have my solution or proposal approved.
Yet the city manager took me aside and said ‘sometimes you’ve got to let
them wander into the mud before you can lead them out the other side.’ So I learned that my ideas – my leadership –
were most often embraced at the end of the debate rather than at the start. So rather than my leadership being resisted
and becoming the issue, my colleagues appreciated being rescued when I knew
when to lead.
This also meant that quite often the board or
council found a solution or reached a conclusion without me needing to speak –
that is I agreed with an outcome and followed that course. Other times I’d make a suggestion that would
fall flat and soon after I support someone else’s input that would be adopted.
By default, had I learned how to follow?
The answer to this question is ‘no’ because
knowing when to follow also requires knowing how to follow and this is not a
passive act. On a corporate board years
ago, the Chair took me aside and said my colleagues were concerned that I
didn’t speak up very often. I replied
that I was behaving as I had done in my political life and sat quiet when I
tended to agree with a decision or direction. He suggested a better approach –
and what was expected on a corporate board – was to still contribute to the
discussion and add value perhaps by pointing out unintended consequences,
suggesting next steps or helping to define what success would look like. This sound and sage advice taught me that
following is not a default position but requires active participation.
Political motives had created a bad habit since
I was picking and choosing what issues to become invested in. This has no place in the private sector and
indeed, if the community’s best interest is the goal – it shouldn’t prevail in
the political domain either. My political
life had become guided by ‘when to lead, when to follow’ yet it was the private
sector that taught me the phrase should be ‘when to lead, how to follow.’
Check out my website at http://frankleonard.ca/ for information on Local Government and Consulting